Posts

The Board That Wouldn’t Let Go: When Legacy Directors Stall Progress

How to Navigate Board Turnover, Term Limits, and the Gentle Art of Moving On

It started subtly: A well-meaning board member added “Emeritus” to their LinkedIn title. No one questioned it. Then they started showing up to committee meetings they weren’t assigned to. They brought donuts. They smiled knowingly during strategic planning. No one had the heart to say it out loud, but everyone was thinking it:

“Is this person ever going to leave?”

The Eternal Director

Every credit union board has—or has had—the Eternal Director. The one who’s been around since the invention of the fax machine and insists it still has strategic relevance. The one who’s forgotten more about your credit union’s history than most staff ever knew…but also seems to have forgotten how debit cards work.

They’re good people. They helped build the place. And now? They are also gently slowing it down to a strategic crawl.

The problem isn’t loyalty. The problem is inertia—wrapped in good intentions and reinforced with homemade cookies at every board meeting.

Why Boards Struggle to Let Go

Let’s start by acknowledging something uncomfortable: for many legacy board members, leaving the board feels like leaving the family—or worse, stepping off the only meaningful leadership stage they’ve known in 30 years.

And for the rest of the board? It’s just awkward. We don’t like conflict. We’re a movement of cooperatives. We talk about financial inclusion and shared values, not forced retirements.

So instead, we quietly tolerate the late arrivals, the inability to log into the board portal, and the occasional off-topic comment about “how we used to do things back in the Reagan years.”

The Strategic Cost of Stagnation

Eww! Stagnant pond muck.

All jokes aside, here’s the cost of keeping legacy board members on well past their sell-by date:

  • Innovation stalls. New ideas get quashed by “That’s not how we do things.”
  • CEO frustration grows. They can’t lead a credit union built for 2030 with a board stuck in 1998.
  • Recruitment suffers. Younger, more diverse candidates don’t see a place for themselves.
  • Risk increases. Governance lapses are more likely when directors don’t understand evolving compliance and fintech trends.

Your credit union may be growing, but your board is aging in place.

The Gentle Art of Moving On

Here’s the good news: succession doesn’t have to be a blood sport. You can encourage graceful exits, celebrate contributions, and build a board that’s ready for the future.

Consider Term Limits. Actually Use Them.

You should know by now that at TEAM Resources we have struggled with term limits. They get rid of good and bad board members indiscriminately. And when it’s difficult to recruit, this feels like shooting your board in its collective foot. (So look carefully at the paragraph below about writing a “real” succession plan.)

But the concept of term limits isn’t controversial in any sector outside credit unions. Set limits. Stick to them. Rotate people off the board. It’s not exile—it’s governance. And this can work well when you have high standards and an effective pipeline.

Bonus tip: Don’t call it a “mandatory departure.” Call it a “celebratory director emeritus transition.” PR matters.

Create an Offboarding Ritual

Throw a dinner. Give a plaque (or a donation to their favorite cause). Let them make a five-minute speech about their “incredible journey.” Clap politely. Then hand them a thank-you card and remind them that they are now a valued member, not a decision-maker.

Write a Real Succession Plan

A succession plan is not “We’ll figure it out when Jerry finally retires or forgets where the boardroom is.” It’s a written document. It includes:

  • Desired future board competencies
  • Outreach and recruitment timelines
  • Term expirations
  • Mentorship pairings between current and future directors

Use Board Self-Assessments

You know what big fans we are of this process. When the participants are actually engaging with the assessment honestly, there’s nothing quite like a well-designed, anonymous board evaluation to say what everyone’s too polite to say out loud. You know, things like:

  • “Some directors are not fully engaged in strategic conversations.”
  • “We need more technology expertise on the board.”
  • “Please stop telling the same story about the 1992 ATM rollout.”

If you conduct assessments annually, you’ll notice patterns. And patterns are harder to ignore than one-off frustrations. 

Bring in Outside Facilitators

Sometimes, the best way to get Jerry to see it’s time to go is to have someone else tell Jerry it’s time to go. A third-party facilitator ( hi, that’s us) can deliver feedback, coach transitions, and help manage tension so you don’t have to.

But What If They Refuse to Leave?

Ah yes. The “boardroom barnacle.” No term limits. No shame. A deeply held belief that their “institutional memory” is too important to ever unplug.

This is when you need the most radical tool in your governance toolbox: a hard conversation.

  • Start with facts: declining engagement, outdated knowledge, missed meetings.
  • Frame it in terms of organizational mission and fiduciary responsibility.
  • Offer a continued role as a mentor or special advisor—without a vote.

And if they still won’t budge?

Governance requires courage. And the board’s primary duty is not to any individual director’s feelings—it’s to the credit union’s long-term health.

Closing Thoughts (and a Nudge)

Credit union boards are known for their stability, integrity, and community focus. Those are strengths. But when stability turns into stagnation, and when institutional loyalty turns into institutional delay, it’s time to revisit what service and stewardship really mean.

Letting go isn’t disloyalty. It’s leadership.

So if your board has a Jerry (or a Jane) who just… won’t… let go – take a breath. Start the conversation. And maybe bring donuts. You’re going to need them.

Want help crafting a board succession plan? Need an outsider to tell Jerry what you can’t? That’s what TEAM Resources does. We don’t bring donuts, but as I’m from Wisconsin I can be talked into bringing cheese curds. Usually.

Who’s Doing the Talking in Your Board Meeting?

Who’s Doing the Talking in Your Board Meeting?

Here comes the new “talking” audit.

It’s not unusual for the CEO to do the most talking in board meetings. But it’s critical to get the right balance of voices and to have input from everyone in the group. Paying attention to this balance and making some intentional changes can move the board and the organization towards greater strategic focus.

By Kevin Smith

Let’s do another poll and see what comes from the question, “Who’s doing the talking in your board meeting?” See below. You have to take the poll before you read on. Ok? Pinky-swear? And be honest. There are only three questions.

[os-widget path=”/kevin-smith/time-management-survey”]

Okay, now that you’ve taken the poll, I’m willing to bet that it’s the CEO who does the most talking in most board meetings. It seems intuitive, doesn’t it? Let’s examine that more closely. Why is the CEO doing all of the gabbing? There are reports to give, detailing updates to projects, updating the numbers from last month, last quarter, last year. This is the person that the board entrusts with the operations of the credit union and the execution of the strategic plan. So, the CEO has the most to say. And if the board has questions, generally they go to the CEO (or a delegate thereof).

If you take this as “matter of fact”, then you’re probably asking yourself why I’m bringing this up. High performing boards and organizations spend their most precious limited resource – time – on strategic stuff, on strategic discussion. That’s not effective if there’s one (or two) voices that take up the largest chunk of the speaking opportunity.

The Common Scenario(s) That We See

What I gather all too often is that the CEO spends an extraordinary amount of time preparing for board meetings (another topic to dive into), where they are mostly reporting out about status and updates. Don’t get me wrong. This is work that needs to get done. But too often directors view the board meeting as simply a place for those reports and updates. Updates can be handled in other ways. Focus on the strategic, the future oriented and the discussion.

So, if you didn’t say that the CEO talks the most, then the next guess is the chair, or perhaps one misguided director who can’t help but talk constantly. At TEAM Resources, we look for those poignant board chairs who ask the right questions, quickly, and then spend more of their time listening and drawing everyone out.  And for that one offender with verbal-diarrhea – it’s up to everyone to let them know when to shut-up … respectfully. (We’ve all seen it one time or another, but too few of us will speak up to make it stop. Some of you have heard me railing on the problems of “Midwest Nice” lately and know what I mean.)

How To Deal With This

There are a lot of ways to get after this problem. (Yes. It’s a problem.) The first thing to do is take an audit of who’s doing the speaking and for how much of the time. You could do this secretly, I suppose. That way no one would modify their behavior knowing what’s going on. But that feels a bit sneaky and sly.

Next, you address any processes that are in place that reinforce the static unbalance of voices. This is all of the “this is how we’ve always done it” features that may not be obvious until you dig in and look carefully. This may be as simple as how the board agenda is structured to give all of the air time to the CEO.

Now, you talk about this as an issue. Give it air time and acknowledge that it’s going on and suggest that it could change for the better. This can be the chair, or any director, or the CEO. Anyone who notices. It may take a bit of gumption to bring it up.

When everyone agrees that this could be more balanced, you decide how it’s going to be addressed. Keep in mind that not everyone who is typically quiet is going to speak right up. It may take time to work up to this. Remember that introverts do NOT like to be put on the spot. They like to have time to think things through and craft a response. So issues may need to be teed up before the meeting for people to prepare. (Do you know who on the board are introverts, ambiverts, or extraverts? Or do you just presume? You might be surprised.)

The Elephant in the Room

Now, I might get some blowback on this, but here goes nothin’. I’ve seen some, and heard about plenty of CEOs who intentionally take up all of the oxygen in a board meeting. The goal is to stall, deflect, divert, obfuscate, all in order to keep directors away from hard questions, or things going awry. It’s a well-known tactic. By monopolizing the time, they can control, well, pretty much everything. I didn’t say this was ALL CEOs, nor is it even a LOT. But if I’m here to educate, then I have to relay the red flags so you know what to watch out for. 

Shake Up the Status Quo

Now – all of those CEO updates and reports: Consider how those might get handled in a different way. They could be written, or recorded. And for cripe’s sake, if they’re written out, don’t make the CEO go over them again at the board meeting! Set the expectation that everyone will do the necessary preparations and come with thoughtful questions. [Please don’t mistake this as an effort to shut down the CEO and shut them up. This is about the balance of voices.]

These steps help you to influence the culture of the boardroom, to move out of the status quo, to move towards the strategic. Directors have a job to do that is more than just oversight; it’s about setting strategy and having good discussion. That can only happen with a multitude of voices. Are you willing to take a closer look at who’s talking in the board room (and for how long)?

What am I missing on this? What do you want to argue about? What’s your “yeah, but …”? I wanna hear. I wanna discuss.

© Copyright 2022 - Site design by Sprout Studio in Madison, WI